CHICAGO (CN) â€“ Just as it upheld Indianaâ€™s anti-union Right-to-Work law, the Seventh Circuit found that Wisconsinâ€™s identical legislation is constitutional.
Adopted by Wisconsinâ€™s Republican-controlled Legislature, Act 1 prohibits individuals from having to pay union dues as a condition of their employment.
Since all employees would benefit from their representation, regardless of union membership, however, the Locals 139 and 140 of the International Union of Operating Engineers challenged the law in a federal complaint.
Proving fatal to the challenge, the Seventh Circuit had already upheld the constitutionality of Indianaâ€™s Right-to-Work law with the 2014 case Sweeney v. Pence.
A federal judge in Wisconsin cited this precedent in dismissing the new challenge, and the Seventh Circuit on Wednesday, rejecting claims that the law effects a taking of union property in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
â€œIn this case, IUOEâ€™s claim that Act 1 works an unconstitutional taking from all affected unions, and the relief IUOE seeks â€” invalidation of parts of Act 1 â€” both clearly â€˜reach beyond [IUOEâ€™s] particular circumstances,â€™â€� U.S. Circuit Judge Joel Flaum wrote for a three-judge panel.
â€œFurther, the panelâ€™s discussions of the Takings Clause issue in Sweeney indicate that an unconstitutional taking would arise, if at all, from the statutory language of the right-to-work statutes or the NLRA, a theory to which a facial challenge would have been well-suited. Likewise, in this case, IUOE asserts that the provision of Act 1 that forbids all union-security agreements amounts to an unconstitutional taking on its face. Thus, the district court correctly construed this claim as a â€˜pre-enforcement facial challengeâ€™ to Act 1, determined that the takings claim was ripe â€¦ and dismissed the claim with prejudice in light of Sweeney.
NLRA is short for the National Labor Relations Act.
Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel applauded the outcome.
â€œThe decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirms what we have argued since this law was enacted in 2015, that Right-to-Work is constitutional,â€� Schimel said in a statement. â€œThe Constitution does not protect a unionâ€™s right to take money from non-union members and Iâ€™m proud to have defended the rule of law in Wisconsin.â€�
The IUOE has not responded to a request sent for comment on their website.
more recommended stories
- Sanders Announces Funds for Vermont’s Community Health Centers
BURLINGTON, Vt., Aug. 17 U.S. Sen..
- Misconduct Dooms Bid to Execute OC Mass Murderer
Orange County Assistant Public Defender Scott.
- Bernie Sanders Tells Big Pharma: Stop Making Americans Pay Twice
While both political parties have denounced.
- Civil Asset Forfeiture Is Not Policing The USA
In America you’re innocent until proven.
- Ethics Watchdog Files Complaint Against Wasserman Schultz
The Foundation for Accountability and Civic.
- Big-name union supporters speak out with vote less than two days away
CANTON, MS (Mississippi News Now) –.
- Maine Governor Begs Feds to “Bring the Hammer Down” on His Own State
Gov. Paul LePage is doing it.
- Senate Committee Votes to Continue Protections for Medical Marijuana States
A vote was taken at the.
- Court Rules Against Politician Who Banned Access to Her Facebook Page
Facebook page of Virginia county politician.
- House Dem: Extremist John Kelly Will Militarize the White House
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) denounced President.