Massachusetts State Supreme Court Affirms Law Does Not Permit Criminalization Of The Homeless,,,
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, June 23, 2016
Aaron Wolfson, media relations specialist, 617-482-3170 x310, email@example.com
Christopher Ott, communications director, 617-482-3170 x322, firstname.lastname@example.org
BOSTON — In a case decided today by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, regarding application of the “necessity defense,” the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts successfully defended the rights of a man charged with trespassing in the hallway of mixed-use property after being unable to access emergency shelter during bitter winter cold.
The following statement may be attributed to Jessie Rossman, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Massachusetts:
“Today’s landmark, unanimous ruling has affirmed, in the state high court’s own words that ‘our law does not permit the punishment of the homeless simply for being homeless.’
“The necessity defense provides a critical safety valve, which allows juries to acquit individuals when they determine that following the law would cause more harm than breaking it.
“This case provides a quintessential example of an instance where the necessity defense is required. Mr Magadini trespassed in the hallway of mixed-use property, but only to escape bitter cold after being denied access to emergency shelter.
“Today’s decision confirms that poverty is not a crime in the Commonwealth, reinforces the very purposes of the necessity defense and ensures that people in the Commonwealth have a voice and an opportunity to decide how we as a community are going to address the issue of homelessness.”
For more information about the case, Commonwealth v. Magadini, go to: